Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2016-11-11 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than Moto M, with a score of 77 against 71.6. HTC U Ultra is a a little bit heavier phone than the Moto M, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Moto M features a little bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto M also has a larger number of cores.
HTC U Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Moto M, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little bit larger display. The HTC U Ultra counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Moto M has a bit longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3050mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra features a way better camera than Moto M, because although it has a much less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.