Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-11-11 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a general score of 81, which is much better than the Moto M's 71.6 general score. The LG G7 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than Moto M, but it is a little bit lighter. The LG G7 ThinQ features a lot better screen than Moto M, because it has a better pixels density, a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bit larger display.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Moto M. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a much higher (4K) video resolution. Moto M counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.