Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Blue, Red and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K52 is just a bit better than the Moto M, getting a overall score of 76 against 71.6. LG K52's design is extremely newer than the Moto M's, although it's a little bit thicker and heavier. The LG K52 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto M. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Moto M counts with a little more vivid display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a way better pixels count per inch in the display. The LG K52 features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG K52 captures greater photographs and videos than Moto M, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the LG K52 also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with a much better resolution. LG K52 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.