Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2016-11-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is much better than Moto M's score of 71.6. The LG V35 ThinQ is a newer phone, and it's also just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto M. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto M, because it has a higher pixels number per inch in the display, a lot better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a bit larger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto M, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Moto M, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better camera than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 16 MP, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much higher (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.