Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is better than Motorola Moto M, with a general score of 81.2 against 71.6. LG V40 ThinQ's body is newer and a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto M's, although it is also just a little heavier. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto M, because it has a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a larger screen. LG V40 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto M, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto M, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. LG V40 ThinQ takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.