Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way better than Moto M, having a general score of 87.1 against 71.6. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is much newer than the Moto M's, but it is heavier and a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Moto M, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Moto M has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto M, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Moto M, because it has a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations, a lot better video definition and a back camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.