Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 is a bit better than Moto M, getting a 76.1 score against 71.6. Galaxy A22's design is much newer than the Moto M's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. Moto M counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Moto M counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1080 x 1920px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto M, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A22 has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto M, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto M has a much longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.