Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has a score of 79.9, which is much better than Moto M's 71.6 global score. Although the Galaxy A25 5G is way newer than the Moto M, it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Moto M has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better screen than Moto M, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Moto M, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto M, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.