Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is better than Motorola Moto M's 71.6 general score. Galaxy A35 5G's construction is much newer than Motorola Moto M's, although it's notably heavier and a bit thicker. The Motorola Moto M has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a little more vivid display than Moto M, because although it has a quite inferior pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a lot better camera than Moto M, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a way more mega-pixels camera and a larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.