Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is way better than Motorola Moto M, having a global score of 86.6 against 71.6. Although the Galaxy A50s is a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto M, it's just a little bit thinner and a lot newer. The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit better looking display than Moto M, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit superior processing unit than Moto M, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Moto M, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s captures much better photos and videos than Moto M, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A50s also has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with way more mega pixels. The Galaxy A50s features improved battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.