Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a lot better than Moto M, having a 91.1 score against 71.6. The Galaxy A52s is a way newer phone than the Moto M, but it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52s has a little sharper display than Moto M, because it has a bigger display, a quite higher pixels amount per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto M, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52s captures a lot better photographs and videos than Moto M, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a much more MP camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a way better battery life than Motorola Moto M, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.