Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has an overall score of 84.6, which is much better than the Moto M's 71.6 score. Galaxy F23's body is notably newer and incredibly lighter, but also just a little thicker than the Moto M. The Samsung Galaxy F23 and Moto M have extremely similar processors, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a slightly better looking screen than Moto M, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2408 resolution. Samsung Galaxy F23 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy F23 counts with a superior battery life than Motorola Moto M, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh. The Galaxy F23 features a better camera than Moto M, because it has a lot better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.