Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is better than the Motorola Moto M, with an 85.2 score against 71.6. Samsung Galaxy F41's construction is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto M. The Galaxy F41 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto M, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit greater pixels density and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy F41 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto M, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
Galaxy F41 captures much better photographs and videos than Moto M, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with much more megapixels. The Galaxy F41 features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.