Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Moto M's global score of 71.6. Galaxy F62's construction is incredibly newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than the Moto M. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little faster processing unit than Moto M, because although it has 4 less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto M, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto M, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy F62 shoots greater photos and videos than Moto M, because it has a lot more megapixels camera, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger camera aperture. Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery performance than Moto M, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.