Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is way better than the Motorola Moto M, having a 90.8 score against 71.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body is a lot newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto M. Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better screen than Moto M, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen.
Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better performance than Moto M, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a way better camera than Moto M, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.