Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than Moto M's 71.6 score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone than Moto M, although it is just a little thicker and noticeably heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto M, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of display, a bigger screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processor than Moto M, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better camera than Moto M, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto M, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 48% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.