Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the Moto M's score of 71.6. Although Galaxy Note3 is better than the Moto M, we must note that it's also a much older, just a little bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone. Moto M counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Moto M has just a bit better display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Moto M also counts with a little higher pixels count per display inch. Galaxy Note3 counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 64 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note3 features a little better battery life than Moto M, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh. The Galaxy Note3 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.