Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-11-11 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is just a bit better than the Moto M, with a global score of 77.6 against 71.6. Even being the best in this review, Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a notably older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than Moto M. Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto M, because it has a better display pixels density, a quite bigger display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 and Moto M both have similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The Moto M has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto M also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note4 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto M, because it has a 6 percent more battery size. The Galaxy Note4 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a camera in the back with a 16 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.