Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is much better than the Moto M, getting an 88.3 score against 71.6. Galaxy S10's body has the same thickness than Moto M, but it's a little bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a brighter display than Moto M, because it has a way better 1440 x 3040 resolution, more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy S10 has a bit faster processor than Moto M, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto M, because although it has a much lower resolution camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy S10 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto M, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.