Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Moto M, with a overall score of 93.6 against 71.6. The Galaxy S10 5G is a heavier cellphone than the Moto M, but both are equally thin. The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better looking screen than Moto M, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Moto M, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy S10 5G features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G takes greater videos and photos than Moto M, because although it has a camera in the back with much less MP, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a really longer battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 48 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.