Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot better than Motorola Moto M, getting a 93.4 score against 71.6. Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is just a little heavier than Motorola Moto M, it's a bit thinner and much newer. The Galaxy S22 features just a little better performance than Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Moto M, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a lot better camera than Moto M, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.