Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the Motorola Moto M, getting a global score of 95.4 against 71.6. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is extremely newer, but thicker and notably heavier than the Motorola Moto M. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Moto M, because it has a quite greater display density, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Moto M, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos, a back facing camera with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 64% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.