Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-11-11 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S23 has a general score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto M's 71.6 global score. Galaxy S23's construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto M. Moto M counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S23, although it has a little bit worse pixel density, a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920.
Motorola Moto M features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S23, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S23 features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto M, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S23 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a back camera with way more MP and a larger camera aperture for better captures in low light situations. The Galaxy S23 has superior battery duration than Moto M, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.