Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is slightly better than Moto M, with a score of 77.6 against 71.6. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a noticeably newer phone than the Moto M, although it is incredibly heavier and much thicker. Motorola Moto M features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto M, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Moto M features a really superior processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Moto M, because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.