Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is better than the Moto M's 71.6 global score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is much newer, but way thicker and noticeably heavier than Moto M. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a sharper screen than Moto M, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto M, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto M. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a camera that is just as good as Moto M's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a camera with way less megapixels and a worse (Full HD) video quality, it also counts with a way larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better battery life than Moto M, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.