Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than Motorola Moto M, getting an 88.5 score against 71.6. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is heavier than the Motorola Moto M, it's a little thinner and noticeably newer. Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better processing power than Moto M, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better screen than Moto M, because it has a larger display, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a back camera with much less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way better (4K) video resolution. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.