Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Moto M, having a 90.6 score against 71.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also notably heavier than Moto M. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Moto M feature similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a way larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much longer battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Moto M features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 16 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.