Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is better than the Motorola Moto M, getting a 78.8 score against 71.6. Xperia Z4v's body is just a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto M, although it is a little bit thicker and was released about a year before. Xperia Z4v features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics processor.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a way better looking screen than Moto M, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Moto M and the Xperia Z4v both feature really similar memory to store more games and applications, they have an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB and exactly the same 32 GB internal storage.
Moto M has a bit better battery duration than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 3050mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Sony Xperia Z4v shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot higher 20.7 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.