Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-11 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a bit better than Motorola Moto M, with a score of 77.1 against 71.6. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G body is just a bit thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto M. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much better looking display than Moto M, because it has a bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a just a bit greater pixels density.
Motorola Moto M has a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto M, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto M, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3050mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Moto M, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images, a way better video quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.