Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is much better than Moto M's score of 71.6. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much newer than the Moto M, it is somewhat thicker and way heavier. Moto M and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro count with very similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a quite worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Moto M, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a lot better camera than Moto M, because it has a larger aperture, a much better video resolution and a way higher resolution back facing camera. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.