Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is better than Moto M, with a 79 score against 71.6. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S design is much newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than the Moto M. Moto M and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S have extremely similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto M, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto M. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a superior battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 65% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.