Search


Compare phones

Global Score
38.439.5
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2008-11-182012-10-15
4.06 x 1.95 x 0.60 inches3.84 x 1.99 x 0.72 inches
3.88 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 65.00$ 65.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
182 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.15.9
Performance
--Qualcomm QSC6155 chipset
processor Single-Core 480 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.57
Storage
112,64 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.60
Camera
5.00 MP1.30 MP
5.54.51
Networks
Wi-Fi--
EDGE and GSM--
SIM--
2.70
Battery Life
810mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
6.7 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS

Comparison review

The Samsung M400 has a general score of 39.5, which is just a bit better than the Motorola MOTO VE66's 38.4 overall score. The Samsung M400 is a a lot newer and just a little bit lighter phone than Motorola MOTO VE66, but it's also thicker. Motorola MOTO VE66 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung M400, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 320 x 240 pixels resolution, the Motorola MOTO VE66 also counts with a bit better pixels count per inch of screen.

MOTO VE66 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung M400. Samsung M400 features a faster CPU than MOTO VE66, because it has more CPU cores. MOTO VE66 captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung M400, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP.

Samsung M400 features improved battery duration than MOTO VE66, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity.

The Samsung M400 and the MOTO VE66 cost the same, which makes this phone an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.