Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
AT&TXT1097
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the Moto X (2014), with an 87.1 score against 73.4. LG Velvet is a noticeably newer and a lot thinner cellphone than the Moto X (2014), but it's notably heavier. The LG Velvet counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the processor in Motorola Moto X (2014), because although the LG Velvet has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (although slower) and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Moto X (2014) counts with a more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels amount per display inch. LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet captures way better videos and photos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG Velvet has a superior battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has an 87% larger battery capacity.
LG Velvet is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.