Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
AT&TXT1097
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. Although the Galaxy S7 is just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014), it's thinner and newer. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a little sharper display than Moto X (2014), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto X (2014) has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Moto X (2014) also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Galaxy S7 has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Moto X (2014), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S7 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 200 GB.
The Galaxy S7 has better battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2300mAh. The Galaxy S7 has a slightly better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution and a worse video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.