Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
AT&TXT1097
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is a bit better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's construction is much newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it is also extremely heavier. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
Moto X (2014) has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little better pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has 4 lesser cores (but faster) and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a lot larger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.