Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
Pure Edition, for T-MobileXT1095
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than Motorola Moto X (2014), having a general score of 87.1 against 73.4. LG Velvet is a a lot newer and much thinner phone than the Motorola Moto X (2014), although it is also way heavier. The Moto X (2014) counts with a better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher display pixel density.
The LG Velvet's processor is just as good as the Moto X (2014) one, because although the LG Velvet has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. LG Velvet takes much better videos and photos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also has a lot larger camera sensor taking way better quality photos, a larger aperture and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
LG Velvet counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has an 87% more battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.