Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
Pure Edition, for T-MobileXT1095
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the Moto X (2014), getting a general score of 79 against 73.4. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the newer 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, giving you some nice extra features and some performance improvements. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is much newer and somewhat thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, although it is also way heavier.
Moto X (2014) has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has 4 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Moto X (2014) counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots greater pictures and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a camera with a much higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a much bigger sensor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.