Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
U.S. CellularXT1093
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s general score of 73.4. Google Pixel 3a's construction is way newer and thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014). Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and a performance increase.
Moto X (2014) features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a little worse screen pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera with lesser MP and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography.
The Google Pixel 3a features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3a counts with improved battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 30 percent bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3a is also a lot cheaper, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.