Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
U.S. CellularXT1093
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer and much thinner device than the Moto X (2014), although it is a bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch of display, a bit smaller screen and a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ has much more memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a lot larger camera aperture and a more mega-pixels camera in the back.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Moto X (2014), but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.