Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
VerizonXT1096
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. Even though Galaxy S10 Lite is notably heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's thinner and also much newer. Moto X (2014) features a more vivid screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a much larger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit more expensive than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.