Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
VerizonXT1096
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the Moto X (2014), having a 79 score against 73.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the newer 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is notably newer and thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it's also noticeably heavier.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) has a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a way smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Moto X (2014) counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 118 percent greater battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures a lot better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a lot larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.