Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2016-09-16 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 is better than the Moto X (2014), with a score of 81.6 against 73.4. Apple iPhone 7's body is notably newer, noticeably thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto X (2014). The Moto X (2014) has a bit faster processing unit than iPhone 7, and although they both have a Quad-Core processing unit and 2 GB of RAM memory, the Moto X (2014) also has an extra graphics processing unit.
Motorola Moto X (2014) has a sharper display than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a higher screen pixels density, a quite bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Apple iPhone 7 captures clearer videos and photos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
The iPhone 7 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 224 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Moto X (2014) has improved battery duration than iPhone 7, because it has a 2300mAh battery size against 1960mAh.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto X (2014). If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Moto X (2014), giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.