Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is better than Moto X (2014), getting an 87.1 score against 73.4. Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a extremely newer and notably thinner cellphone than Moto X (2014), although it's also a lot heavier. Moto X (2014) has just a bit better display than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a bit greater pixel count per display inch.
IPhone 8 Plus has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more processing cores (but slower), a 64-bits processing unit and a higher amount of RAM. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 256 GB internal memory.
IPhone 8 Plus has a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 2691mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh. IPhone 8 Plus features just a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto X (2014). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto X (2014), letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.