Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-24 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a score of 81.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. Even though the Apple iPhone SE (2020) is just a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto X (2014), it's much thinner and much newer. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola Moto X (2014) works with Android 5.0 operating system.
IPhone SE (2020) has a superior CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM, a 64-bits processor and more processing cores. Motorola Moto X (2014) has a more vivid screen than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a greater pixels density, a way better 1920 x 1080px resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The iPhone SE (2020) features a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
IPhone SE (2020) has a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with better battery performance than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 26% bigger battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) costs more money than Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.