Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), getting an 88.1 score against 73.4. Even though iPhone X is heavier than Motorola Moto X (2014), it's a lot thinner and much newer. IPhone X features a bit better processing unit than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 1 GB more RAM, 2 more cores (although they are slower) and a 64-bits CPU.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a little bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone X, although it has a little lower screen density, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little smaller screen. IPhone X shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
The iPhone X has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 256 GB internal memory. The iPhone X counts with longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 2716mAh battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto X (2014). So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto X (2014), resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.