Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 general score. IPhone XR is a newer and thinner phone than Moto X (2014), but it is way heavier. Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a brighter display than iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
Apple iPhone XR features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU, more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The iPhone XR has a little bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera in the back with lesser megapixels and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
IPhone XR has a superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. IPhone XR features longer battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 28 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto X (2014). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Moto X (2014), and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.