Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s general score of 73.4. Apple iPhone XS's design is much newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Moto X (2014). The Moto X (2014) features a bit better looking display than iPhone XS, although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit smaller screen and a just a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage. The iPhone XS counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more CPU cores , a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light images.
The iPhone XS has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 2659mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto X (2014). If you want to save some dollars, you can get Moto X (2014), and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.