Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 overall score. Although the Google Pixel 3 XL is incredibly heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's thinner and incredibly newer. The Google Pixel 3 XL's CPU is very similar to the Moto X (2014) one, because although the Google Pixel 3 XL has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of 2500 MHz cores.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller screen. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a lower video definition and a lesser megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a really longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 49 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.