Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X (2014), getting a 78.9 score against 73.4. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is extremely newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto X (2014). Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features.
Motorola Moto X (2014) features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little higher display pixels density.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3a XL captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.