Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gold | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the Moto X (2014), with a score of 82.9 against 73.4. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is much heavier than Moto X (2014), it's somewhat thinner and also noticeably newer. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
Moto X (2014) has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit smaller display and a little less pixels per screen inch. Google Pixel 4 XL features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much longer battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has a 61% larger battery size. Google Pixel 4 XL captures clearer photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a much bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
Google Pixel 4 XL costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.